Blacher v. State of California et al
| Marlon Blacher |
| State of California, Marcus Pollard, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Ralph Diaz |
| 3:2020cv01861 |
| September 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Gonzalo P Curiel |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. If Petitioner wishes to challenge his conviction, which took place in the Northern District of California, he should file a new petition in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The Court dismisses the case without prejudice to Petitioner.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg) |
Filing 2
ORDER DISMISSING Petition Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 9/22/20.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
|
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Ralph Diaz, Marcus Pollard, State of California, filed by Marlon Blacher.(Filing fee $5, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1861-GPC-BLM. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.(jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
