Shaw v. Sherman et al
Shaun Reginald Shaw |
Xavier Becerra and Stu Sherman |
3:2020cv01875 |
September 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Daniel E Butcher |
Gonzalo P Curiel |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Anne Jadovitz on behalf of Stu Sherman (Jadovitz, Jennifer)Attorney Jennifer Anne Jadovitz added to party Stu Sherman(pty:res) (jms). |
Filing 4 Order Requiring Response to Petition: Answer by Respondent due 12/15/2020, Traverse by Petitioner due 1/14/2021; Or Motion to Dismiss Deadline 12/15/2020, Opposition Motion to Dismiss due 1/14/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher on 10/9/20.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg) |
Filing 3 ORDER Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 10/8/20. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shaun Reginald Shaw. (jms)(jrd) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Against Stu Sherman, Xavier Becerra, filed by Shaun Reginald Shaw. ($5.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1875-GPC-DEB. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case. (jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.