Sawyer v. IBEW Local 569 et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Mark Sawyer
Defendant: DOES 1-50 and IBEW Local 569
Case Number: 3:2020cv01898
Filed: September 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Roger T Benitez
Referring Judge: William V Gallo
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0185
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2020 Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court Superior Court of San Diego filed by IBEW Local 569. (Attachments: #1 Objection to Graham Declaration)(Ochoa, Ricardo) (mme).
November 3, 2020 Filing 7 Minute Order issued by the Honorable Roger T. Benitez: Submitting #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Court to issue written Order. Motion Hearing date of 11/9/2020 is hereby vacated. (no document attached) (gxr)
November 2, 2020 Filing 6 REPLY to Response to Motion re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by IBEW Local 569. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Ochoa Declaration, #2 Exhibit Exhibit to Ochoa Declaration)(Ochoa, Ricardo) (dlg).
October 26, 2020 Filing 5 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Daniel Mark Sawyer. (Graham, Jeremiah) (mme).
October 23, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION to Remand to State Court Superior Court of San Diego by Daniel Mark Sawyer. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration Declaration of Jeremiah D. Graham, #3 Exhibit Declaration Exhibit 1)(Graham, Jeremiah) (mme).
September 30, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by IBEW Local 569. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities Memorandum of Points and Authorities)(Ochoa, Ricardo) (mme).
September 23, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by IBEW Local 569 re #1 Notice of Removal, . No Parties With Financial Interest. (Ochoa, Ricardo) *QC Mailer sent re missing case number*(mme).
September 23, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, case number 37-2020-00028034-CU-DF-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-14559247.), filed by IBEW Local 569. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1898-BEN-WVG. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case.(vxc) (dsn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sawyer v. IBEW Local 569 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Mark Sawyer
Represented By: Jeremiah Daniel Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-50
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IBEW Local 569
Represented By: Ricardo Ochoa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?