Bushansky v. Akcea Therapeutics, Inc. et al
| Stephen Bushansky |
| B. Lynne Parshall, Barbara Yanni, Joseph Klein, III, Sandford D. Smith, Damien McDevitt, Amber Salzman, Akcea Therapeutics, Inc., Elaine Hochberg and Michael J. Yang |
| 3:2020cv01933 |
| September 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Allison H Goddard |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Stephen Bushansky (Elkins, Joel) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Stephen Bushansky of case(s) 20-cv-01281 re #1 Complaint, . (Elkins, Joel) (anh). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (smd) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Akcea Therapeutics, Inc., Elaine Hochberg, Joseph Klein, III, Damien McDevitt, B. Lynne Parshall, Amber Salzman, Sandford D. Smith, Michael J. Yang, Barbara Yanni ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-14589416.), filed by Stephen Bushansky. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1933-BEN-AHG. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Elkins, Joel)(smd) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
