Fuentes v. Montgomery et al
| Jonathan Fuentes |
| W.L. Montgomery, J. Sillas, L. Menidvil and J. Beltran |
| 3:2020cv01942 |
| September 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jonathan Fuentes. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/23/2020 (jms) |
Filing 7
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns Accepting Document: Motion for Appointment of Counsel, from Plaintiff Jonathan Fuentes. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation, Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/23/2020. Signed by the Chambers of Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 11/24/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jonathan Fuentes. (jms) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: (1) Denying Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) and Dismissing Civil Action Without Prejudice for Failing to Prepay Filing Fees Required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a), and (2) Denying Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF Nos. 1-3). Plaintiff has forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP which complies with 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2) and CivLR 3.2(b). The Clerk of the Court will provide Plaintiff with this Court's approved form "Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis." Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 10/16/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service. Copy of blank IFP form sent via U.S. Mail to Plaintiff.) (jdt)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns Accepting Complaint, from Plaintiff Jonathan Fuentes. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) exceed the page limitations set by S.D. Cal. CivLR 8.2(a) and S.D. Cal. General Order 653A, and are not accompanied by a properly supported Motion to Exceed page limitations or Motion for Emergency Relief from General Order 653A; Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) received by U.S. Mail and not properly e-filed in accordance with S.D. Cal. General Order 653A.. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 10/2/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jonathan Fuentes. (jms) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jonathan Fuentes. (jms)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against W. L. Montgomery, J. Beltran, L. Menidvil, J. Sillas, filed by Jonathan Fuentes. ($400.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1942-LAB-RBM. Judge Larry Alan Burns and Magistrate Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
