Ewing v. Auto Transport Groupe, Inc et al
| Anton Ewing |
| Luis Molina and Auto Transport Groupe, Inc |
| 3:2020cv01964 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| William Q Hayes |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Letter from Luis Molina. NUNC PRO TUNC 11/9/2020. (ag) |
Filing 4
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge William Q. Hayes Accepting Document: Letter, from Defendant Luis Molina. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ.L. Rule 5.2 - Missing Proof of Service. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/9/2020. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 11/19/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anton Ewing. Auto Transport Groupe, Inc served. (ag) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons has been provided to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (zda) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number CAS124611.), filed by Anton Ewing. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1964-WQH-AGS. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case. (Ewing, Anton)(zda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
