Davall v. Cordero et al
| Joseph Davall |
| D. White, Whitman and A. Cordero |
| 3:2020cv01968 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order by Joseph Davall. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/25/2020. (tcf) |
Filing 8
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Janis L. Sammartino Accepting Document: Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order, from Plaintiff Joseph Davall. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation, Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/25/2020. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 12/2/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration by Joseph Davall. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/16/2020.(jms) |
|
Filing 6
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Janis L. Sammartino Accepting Document: Motion for Reconsideration, from Plaintiff Joseph Davall. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Fed. R. Civ. P. l5(d) - Supplemental pleadings require court order. Nunc Pro Tunc 11/16/2020. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 11/18/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (Attachments: #1 IFP Letter) [IFP packet mailed to Plaintiff] (tcf) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER (1) Granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; (2) Dismissing Defendant White Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.9 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b)(1); and (3) Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service Upon Defendants Cordero and Whitman Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 11/5/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Janis L. Sammartino Accepting #1 Complaint,, from Plaintiff Joseph Davall. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) received by U.S. Mail and not properly e-filed in accordance with S.D. Cal. General Order 653A. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 9/6/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joseph Davall. (jms) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against A. Cordero, D. White, Whitman, filed by Joseph Davall.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1968-JLS-KSC. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
