Howard v. Medical Care Providers for C.D.C.R. et al
| Tiffany Howard |
| Doctor DOE and Medical Care Providers for C.D.C.R. |
| 3:2020cv01970 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| William V Gallo |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Transfer Letter Received from Eastern District of California. Case number in other court is 2:20cv02097 (jpp) |
| Filing 3 Case transferred to the Eastern District of California. Files transferred electronically to: *Eastern District of California*.*501 I Street, Room 4-200**Sacramento, CA 95814-7300*. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tcf) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tiffany Howard. (jms)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Medical Care Providers for C.D.C.R., DOE (Primary Care Provider), filed by Tiffany Howard. ($400.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1970-JLS-WVG. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
