Smith v. William et al
| Benyamin Smith |
| Dr. Jon Montgomery, William D. Gore, Liana Sabatini and Krout William |
| 3:2020cv01983 |
| October 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Todd W Robinson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER DISMISSING Civil Action Without Prejudice for Failing to Pay Filing Fee and/or Failing to Move to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court grants Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order isfiled to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b)complete and file a properly supported Motion to Proceed IFP.. Signed by Judge Todd W. Robinson on 10/29/20.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service including blank IFP form)(dlg)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Benyamin Smith. (jms) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Against Krout William, Jon Montgomery, Liana Sabatini, William D. Gore, filed by Benyamin Smith. ($400.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1983-MDD. Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin is assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
