Legaux v. Mercer Investment Consulting, Inc. et al
| Lucretia Legaux |
| DOES 1 through 100 and Mercer Investment Consulting, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv02041 |
| October 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jmo)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting Plaintiff Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #2 ). Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 11/9/20. (jmo)
|
|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Cynthia Bashant for all further proceedings. The new case number is 20CV2041-BAS-AGS.(no document attached) (mme)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lucretia Legaux. (vxc) (dsn)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against DOES 1 through 100, Mercer Investment Consulting, Inc., IFP Filed, filed by Lucretia Legaux. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-B)The new case number is 3:20-cv-2041-BEN-AGS. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case. (Duford, Kelly)(vxc) (dsn)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
