Calderon v. Saul
Plaintiff: Francisco Javier Calderon
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 3:2020cv02092
Filed: October 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Ruben B Brooks
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 id
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine L. Parker on behalf of Andrew Saul (Parker, Katherine)Attorney Katherine L. Parker added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft) (jpp).
December 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Sharon Lahey on behalf of Andrew Saul (Lahey, Sharon)Attorney Sharon Lahey added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft) (jpp).
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Francisco Javier Calderon. Francisco Javier Calderon served. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Shapiro, Brian) (jpp).
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, Pursuant to General Order 707, by Francisco Javier Calderon. (zda)
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jpp)
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 10/28/2020. (jpp)
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE ASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to General Order 707, United States Magistrate Ruben B. Brooks has been randomly assigned. Plaintiff should print and complete the attached consent/declination form. The executed form must be received by the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of this notice. (mcb) (sjt).
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Francisco Javier Calderon (mcb) (Main Document 3 replaced on 10/26/2020) (mcb). (Main Document 3 replaced on 10/26/2020) (mcb). (Main Document 3 replaced on 10/27/2020) (mcb). (sjt).
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Francisco Javier Calderon. (mcb) (Main Document 2 replaced on 10/27/2020) (mcb).(sjt).
October 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, IFP Filed, filed by Francisco Javier Calderon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-2092-RBB. Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks is assigned to the case. (Shapiro, Brian)(mcb) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/27/2020) (mcb). (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/27/2020) (mcb). (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Calderon v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Represented By: Katherine L. Parker
Represented By: Sharon Lahey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francisco Javier Calderon
Represented By: Brian C Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?