Tesfamichael v. LaRose et al
| Giotom Tesfamichael and Gebrekristos Yemanebrhan Kidane |
| Tony H. Pham, William P. Barr, Christopher LaRose, Chad F. Wolf and Kenneth Cuccinelli |
| 3:2020cv02154 |
| November 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Marilyn L Huff |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice of Dismissal (efiled as a MOTION to Dismiss), by Giotom Tesfamichael. (Sontag, Stephanie) (jpp). |
Filing 3
SCHEDULING ORDER. Answer by Respondent due 12/7/2020. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 11/09/2020.(jpp)
|
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Thomas J. Whelan is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Marilyn L. Huff for all further proceedings. The new case number is 20-cv-2154-H-BGS.(no document attached) (vxc) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Against Christopher LaRose, Tony H. Pham, Kenneth Cuccinelli, Chad F. Wolf, William P. Barr, filed by Giotom Tesfamichael. (Filing fee $5.00 - receipt number ACASDC-14806258) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration, #3 Declaration, #4 Declaration, #5 Declaration, #6 Exhibit Authentication, #7 Exhibit)The new case number is 3:20-cv-2154-W-BGS. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Sontag, Stephanie)(jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
