Ancheta et al v. FCA US LLC et al
Anthony Ancheta and Cristina Ancheta |
Does 1 Through 10 and FCA US LLC |
3:2020cv02197 |
November 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Ruben B Brooks |
Gonzalo P Curiel |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 bc |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 DECLARATION of Mark W. Skanes in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendant FCA US LLC. (mcb) (rmc). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance (mcb) (rmc). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by FCA US LLC. Identifying Other Affiliate Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, N.V., Other Affiliate FCA North American Holdings, LLC, Other Affiliate FCA Holdco B.V. for FCA US LLC. (mcb) (rmc). |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by FCA US LLC. (mcb). (rmc). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA, San Diego County, case number 37-2020-00035829-CU-BC-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-14849749.), filed by FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Memo of Points and Authorities A- State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)The new case number is 3:20-cv-2197-GPC-RBB. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case.(mcb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/12/2020: #7 Proof of Service) (mcb). (rmc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.