Daniels v. Fry et al
Diane Deliah Daniels |
Jaime Murillo, David Nisleit, Joel Wohlfeil, Thomas Gibbons, Aledra Retano, Jayson Stebbins, Mark Milton, Jamie Felix, Scott Hildebrand, Michael Roddy, Gerald Hassell, William Gore, Elizabeth Chen, Peter Doft, Casey James, Brian Moynihan, Gary Kreep, Timothy Walsh, Keneth Medel, John Meyer, Daryl Fry, Edward Bishop and Brian Richard |
3:2020cv02226 |
November 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Michael S Berg |
William Q Hayes |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE to World by Diane Deliah Daniels. NUNC PRO TUNC 8/16/2021. (ag) |
|
Filing 12 NOTICE to World by Diane Deliah Daniels. NUNC PRO TUNC 7/22/2021. (ag) |
|
Filing 10 NOTICE to World by Diane Deliah Daniels. NUNC PRO TUNC 7/6/2021. (ag) |
|
Filing 8 Letter from Diane Deliah Daniels. NUNC PRO TUNC 12/22/2020 (jmr) (jms). |
|
Filing 6 Letter from Diane Deliah Daniels. NUNC PRO TUNC 12/2/2020. (ag) |
|
Filing 4 Letter from Diane Deliah Daniels. NUNC PRO TUNC 11/24/2020. (ag) |
|
|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 DUE), filed by Diane Deliah Daniels. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Coversheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-2226-WQH-MSB. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case.(mcb) (rmc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.