Weddington v. Global Payments, Inc. et al
Monica Weddington |
Global Payment Holding Company, Heartland Payment Systems, LLC, Darcy Seirer, Global Payments, Inc. and DOES 1-100 |
3:2020cv02301 |
November 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Anthony J Battaglia |
Andrew G Schopler |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER (AGS): Due to an unexpected change in the Court's schedule, the February 11, 2021 Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference are reset to February 24, 2021, at 2:00 p.m. The ENE statements and joint discovery plan are now due February 17, 2021. All other provisions of this Court's original ENE Order remain in effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 1/19/2021.(no document attached) (mxa) |
Filing 8 ORDER Granting Joint Motion for Dismissal of Party. Defendant Darcy Seirer is dismissed without prejudice in consideration of a waiver of fees and costs. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 1/11/2021. (jrm) |
Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Dismiss Party Darcy Seirer by Monica Weddington. (Potter, Margie)(jrm). |
Filing 6 ORDER (AGS): Due to the Court's schedule, the February 11, 2021 Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference are reset to that same day at 9:30 a.m. All other provisions of this Court's original ENE order remain in effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 1/5/2021. (no document attached) (mxa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE AND ORDER: (1) for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and (2) Setting Rule 26 Compliance and Case Management Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference set for 2/11/2021 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler. Joint Discovery Plan due 2/4/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 12/16/2020.(jrm) |
Filing 4 NOTICE Of Filing Of State Court Answers by Global Payment Holding Company, Global Payments, Inc., Heartland Payment Systems, LLC, Darcy Seirer re #1 Notice of Removal,, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Defendants Global Payments Inc., Heartland Payment Systems, LLC, Global Payment Holding Company, and Darcy Sierers Notice Of Filing Of State Court Answers, #2 Exhibit B to Defendants Global Payments Inc., Heartland Payment Systems, LLC, Global Payment Holding Company, and Darcy Sierers Notice Of Filing Of State Court Answers)(Owen, Kaitlin) (jrm). |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Global Payment Holding Company, Global Payments, Inc., Heartland Payment Systems, LLC, Darcy Seirer re #1 Notice of Removal,, to Federal Court (Owen, Kaitlin) (jrm). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Global Payment Holding Company, Global Payments, Inc., Heartland Payment Systems, LLC, Darcy Seirer. No Parties With Financial Interest. (smd)(sjt). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Diego Superior Court, case number 37-2020-00036977-CU-WT-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-14936936.), filed by Global Payments, Inc., Global Payment Holding Company, Darcy Seirer, Heartland Payment Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Declaration, #6 Declaration -2, #7 Declaration -3)The new case number is 3:20-cv-2301-AJB-AGS. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.(smd) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.