Clair v. Partech, Inc. et al
| Robert Clair |
| DOES 1 through 20 and Partech, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv02302 |
| November 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Anthony J Battaglia |
| Linda Lopez |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Order Confirming Settlement and Setting Deadline to File Joint Motion for Dismissal. Joint Motion for Dismissal due: 2/16/2021. If a Joint Motion for Dismissal and Proposed Order for Dismissal are not submitted by 2/16/2021, then a Settlement Disposition Conference shall be held. Settlement Disposition Conference set for 2/25/2021 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez on 1/15/2021.(jrm)
|
| Filing 8 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez: An Early Neutral Evaluation Conference was held on 1/15/2021. The case settled. Order to follow. (Plaintiff's Attorney Jason E. Guerra) (Defendant's Attorney Christine A Kohler)(no document attached) (bbc) |
|
Filing 7
Minute Order by Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez: No later than January 7, 2021 by 5:00 p.m., Plaintiff shall lodge a supplement to their confidential settlement statement such that they are in compliance with Judge Lopez's December 3, 2020 ENE Order that directs: "Each party's confidential statement must include... [a] specific and current demand or offer for settlement addressing all relief or remedies sought. If a specific demand or offer for settlement cannot be made at the time the brief is submitted, then the reasons therefore must be stated along with a statement as to when the party will be in a position to state a demand or make an offer. A general statement that a party will 'negotiate in good faith,' is not a specific demand or offer...." The confidential supplement should be lodged as required by Judge Lopez's Civil Chambers Rules with efile_Lopez@casd.uscourts.gov and should not exceed two pages. The confidential supplement should not be filed on the docket. This minute order does not otherwise alter the Court's order concerning the ENE Conference. (See ECF No. 4.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Lopez on January 7, 2021. (no document attached) (bbc)
|
| Filing 6 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN by Robert Clair (Guerra, Jason) QC Mailer sent on 1/8/2021 (jrm). |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Partech, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Kohler, Christine)(jrm). |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference set for 1/15/2021 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez. Joint Discovery Plan due 1/6/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez on 12/2/2020.(jrm)
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Partech, Inc.. (smd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Partech, Inc.. Identifying Corporate Parent Par Technology Corporation for Partech, Inc.. (smd) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from San Diego Superior Court, case number 37-2020-00035684-CU-OE-NC. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-14937260.), filed by Partech, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration, #3 Declaration State Court Complaint Included)The new case number is 3:20-cv-2302-AJB-LL. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez are assigned to the case.(smd) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
