Flowers by Adelaide, Inc. v. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. et al
| Flowers by Adelaide, Inc. |
| Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited and The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv02344 |
| December 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Allison H Goddard |
| Dana M Sabraw |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 jd |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER Granting #10 Joint Motion to Extend Defendants' Deadline Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Class Action Complaint. Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited answer due 2/16/2021; The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. answer due 2/16/2021. Signed by Chief Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 1/25/21. (sxa)
|
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Class Action Complaint by Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Anscombe, Anthony) *QC Mailer sent re proposed order should not be attached* (mme). |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (CLASS ACTION) against All Defendants, filed by Flowers by Adelaide, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Graham, Mary) (mme). |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Granting #6 Joint Motion to Extend Defendants' Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended until January 19, 2021. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 12/31/2020. (mme)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Melanie Atswei Ayerh on behalf of Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (Ayerh, Melanie)Attorney Melanie Atswei Ayerh added to party Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited(pty:dft), Attorney Melanie Atswei Ayerh added to party The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.(pty:dft) (mme). |
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint by Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.. (Anscombe, Anthony)Attorney Anthony John Anscombe added to party Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited(pty:dft), Attorney Anthony John Anscombe added to party The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.(pty:dft) (mme). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Flowers by Adelaide, Inc.. Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited served. (Graham, Mary) (mme). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Flowers by Adelaide, Inc.. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. served. (Graham, Mary) (mme). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Elizabeth Graham on behalf of Flowers by Adelaide, Inc. (Graham, Mary) (mme). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (zda)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-14968315.), filed by Flowers by Adelaide, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)The new case number is 3:20-cv-2344-DMS-AHG. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Graham, Mary)(zda)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
