Carrillo et al v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
Octavio Carrillo and Patricia Carrillo |
Does 1 Through 10, Amazon.com, Inc. and HTMALL |
3:2020cv02347 |
December 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Karen S Crawford |
Dana M Sabraw |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Amazon.com, Inc.. (Hussey, Julie)Attorney Julie L. Hussey added to party Amazon.com, Inc.(pty:dft) (mme). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Patricia Carrillo, Octavio Carrillo. Amazon.com, Inc. served. (Luneau, Thomas) (mme). |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Amazon.com, Inc., Does 1 Through 10, HTMALL, filed by Patricia Carrillo, Octavio Carrillo. (Luneau, Thomas) (mme). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mcb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-14969863.), filed by Octavio Carrillo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-02347-DMS-KSC. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Luneau, Thomas)(mcb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.