Bingham v. 3M Company et al
| Randal Bingham |
| 3M Company, Dynax Corporation, National Foam, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., Tyco Fire Products, LP, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., E.I. DuPont De Nemours, Inc., Kidde Fire Fire Fighting, Inc., The Chemours Co.., The Chemours Company FC, LLC, Does 1 to 100, Kidde PLC Inc., Chemguard, Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas, Inc., Kidde-Fenwall, Inc., Depont De Nemours, Inc. and E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. |
| 3:2020cv02362 |
| December 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Ruben B Brooks |
| William Q Hayes |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 pl |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Transfer Letter Received from District of South Carolina. Case number in other court is 2:20-cv-04391 (jpp) |
| Filing 2 Case transferred to District of South Carolina. Files transferred electronically to: *District of South Carolina*.*PO Box 835**Charleston, SC 29402* (Attachments: #1 MDL 2873 CTO-40) (jdt) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-14985998.), filed by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:20-cv-2362-WQH-RBB. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case.(mcb) (rmc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
