O'Connor v. The Anthem Companies, Inc. et al
| Rowena O'Connor |
| Does 1-50, The Anthem Companies, Inc. and The Anthem Companies of California, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv02444 |
| December 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 wt Removal- Employment (Wrongful Termination) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt: In light of the stay entered in this case (ECF No. #8 ), the 2/2/2021 Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conferences (ECF No. #6 ) are hereby VACATED. (mjg)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER Granting Joint Motion for Binding Arbitration (Doc. #7 ). This action is stayed pending the outcome of the binding arbitration Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 1/4/2021. (jdt)
|
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Binding Arbitration by The Anthem Companies, Inc.. (Ly, Sabrina)Attorney Sabrina M. Ly added to party The Anthem Companies, Inc.(pty:dft) (jdt). |
|
Filing 6
NOTICE AND ORDER: (1) For Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, (2) Setting Rule 26 Compliance and Case Management Conference. An Early Neutral Evaluation of your case will be held by video conference on 2/2/2021 at 9:00 a.m. In the event the case does not settle at the ENE, a Case Management Conference will be held at the conclusion of the ENE. ENE Statements Required: On or before 1/25/2021. Submission of Magistrate Judge Consent Form: No later than 12/30/2020, each party shall provide Plaintiff's counsel with an executed copy of the attached consent form, titled "Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge." If (and only if) all parties have consented to the reference to a magistrate judge, then Plaintiff shall file the consent form(s) in paper format at the Clerk's Office by 1/4/2021. The Rule 26(f) conference shall be completed on or before 12/30/2020. The date of initial disclosure shall occur before 1/25/2021. A Joint Discovery Plan shall be filed on or before 1/25/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 12/16/2020. (jdt)
|
| Filing 5 DECLARATION re #4 Notice (Other), by Defendant The Anthem Companies of California, Inc.. (Ly, Sabrina) (jdt). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing of State Court File with District Court by The Anthem Companies of California, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Sabrina Punia-Ly)(Ly, Sabrina)Attorney Sabrina M. Ly added to party The Anthem Companies of California, Inc. (pty:dft) (jdt). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by The Anthem Companies of California, Inc., The Anthem Companies, Inc., Identifying Other Affiliate Anthem, Inc. for The Anthem Companies of California, Inc., The Anthem Companies, Inc. (zda)(jrd) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by The Anthem Companies of California, Inc., The Anthem Companies, Inc. (zda)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL With Jury Demand (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number ACASDC-15054899.), filed by The Anthem Companies, Inc., The Anthem Companies of California, Inc., Does 1-50, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Declaration of Dona Blackman, #4 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:20-cv-2444-W-JLB. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case.(zda)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
