Stekel v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
| Toby Stekel |
| Midland Credit Management Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00068 |
| January 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| William Q Hayes |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Midland Credit Management Inc. . Identifying Corporate Parent Encore Capital Group for Midland Credit Management Inc.. (Strickland, Leah) (ag). |
Filing 8
NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation and Setting Rule 26 Compliance and Case Management Conference. An Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference is set for 4/7/2021 at 9:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler. A Joint Discovery Plan is due by 3/29/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 2/22/2021.(ag)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas F Landers on behalf of Midland Credit Management Inc. (Landers, Thomas)Attorney Thomas F Landers added to party Midland Credit Management Inc.(pty:dft) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Midland Credit Management Inc..(Strickland, Leah) (ag). |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ENTRY: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Initial Complaint (ECF No. #4 ) is GRANTED. Defendant Midland Credit Management Inc. shall file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff Toby Stekel's Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) on or before February 19, 2021. (no document attached) (ag) |
| Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Midland Credit Management Inc.. (Strickland, Leah)Attorney Leah Suzanne Strickland added to party Midland Credit Management Inc.(pty:dft) (ag). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Toby Stekel. Midland Credit Management Inc. served. (Sanders, Craig) (ag). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (sjt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Midland Credit Management Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15203206). Filed by Toby Stekel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)The new case number is 3:21-cv-68-WQH-AGS. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case. (Sanders, Craig)(sjt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stekel v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Toby Stekel | |
| Represented By: | Craig B. Sanders |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Midland Credit Management Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Leah Suzanne Strickland |
| Represented By: | Thomas F Landers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
