Fenton v. Kirk et al
| Nancy L. Fenton |
| Greg Kirk, Does 1-50 and JMK Properties |
| 3:2021cv00069 |
| January 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 pi |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: (1) Granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, and (2) Dismissing without Prejudice Plaintiff's Complaint. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's IFP Motion and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's Complaint as frivolous due to lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff MAY FILE an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies noted above within forty-five (45) days of the electronic docketing of this Order. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 2/8/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nancy L. Fenton. (zda)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Against Greg Kirk, JMK Properties, Does 1-50, IFP Filed, filed by Nancy L. Fenton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-69-JLS-KSC. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Fenton, Nancy L.)(zda)(Modified on 1/13/2021; Requested Proposed LNO)(zda)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
