Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company et al v. Yuma County Water Users Association et al
Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company and D'Arrigo Bros Co. of California |
Yuma County Water Users Association and Does 1 through 10 |
3:2021cv00078 |
January 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Janis L Sammartino |
Andrew G Schopler |
Torts to Land |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER Vacating Hearing re #8 MOTION to Dismiss. On its own motion, the Court VACATES the hearing currently set for March 18, 2021 and takes the matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/11/2021. (tcf) |
Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Yuma County Water Users Association. (Hassan, Omar) (tcf). |
Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by D'Arrigo Bros Co. of California, Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company. (Brubaker, Alan) (tcf). |
Filing 11 PRO HAC APPROVED: Steven L. Theesfeld appearing for Plaintiffs D'Arrigo Bros Co. of California, Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company (no document attached) (rmc) |
Filing 10 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number ACASDC-15421323.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Theesfeld, Steven) (rmc). |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF DOCUMENT by Yuma County Water Users Association re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint filed by Yuma County Water Users Association . (Hassan, Omar) (tcf). |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by Yuma County Water Users Association. (Hassan, Omar) (tcf). |
Filing 7 ***Document withdrawn per ECF #9 *** MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint by Yuma County Water Users Association. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Declaration of Tom Davis, #3 Proposed Order)(Hassan, Omar) QC mailer sent re: document not signed and proposed order attached (tcf). Modified to withdraw on 2/12/2021 (tcf). |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Does 1 through 10, Yuma County Water Users Association, filed by Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company, D'Arrigo Bros Co. of California. (Brubaker, Alan) (tcf). |
Filing 5 ORDER Granting #4 Joint Motion to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint. Defendant must file its response to Plaintiffs' Complaint on or before 2/3/2021. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 1/22/2021. (tcf) |
Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Yuma County Water Users Association. (Hassan, Omar) Modified text to reflect document filed on 1/22/2021 (tcf). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Counsel by Omar F. Hassan on behalf of Yuma County Water Users Association (Hassan, Omar)Attorney Omar F. Hassan added to party Yuma County Water Users Association(pty:dft) (tcf). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Yuma County Water Users Association. No Parties With Financial Interest. (mcb) (dsn) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15208233.), filed by Yuma County Water Users Association. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration)The new case number is 3:21-cv-78-JLS-AGS. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.(mcb)(dsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.