Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sztrom et al
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Sztrom Wealth Management, Inc., David Sztrom and Michael Sztrom
Case Number: 3:2021cv00086
Filed: January 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Ruben B Brooks
Referring Judge: Marilyn L Huff
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2021 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Securities and Exchange Commission, as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Waiver of Service for David Sztrom, #2 Waiver of Service for Sztrom Wealth Management)(Sew Hoy, Michael) (mme).
January 26, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Natalie Prescott on behalf of David Sztrom, Michael Sztrom, Sztrom Wealth Management, Inc. (Prescott, Natalie)Attorney Natalie Prescott added to party David Sztrom(pty:dft), Attorney Natalie Prescott added to party Michael Sztrom(pty:dft), Attorney Natalie Prescott added to party Sztrom Wealth Management, Inc.(pty:dft) (jmr).
January 26, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Sean T. Prosser on behalf of David Sztrom, Michael Sztrom, Sztrom Wealth Management, Inc. (Prosser, Sean)Attorney Sean T. Prosser added to party David Sztrom(pty:dft), Attorney Sean T. Prosser added to party Michael Sztrom(pty:dft), Attorney Sean T. Prosser added to party Sztrom Wealth Management, Inc.(pty:dft) (jmr).
January 15, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mcb) (dsn)
January 15, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, No Fee Required, filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-86-H-RBB. Judge Marilyn L. Huff and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case. (Sew Hoy, Michael)(mcb) (dsn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sztrom et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sztrom Wealth Management, Inc.
Represented By: Sean T. Prosser
Represented By: Natalie Prescott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Sztrom
Represented By: Sean T. Prosser
Represented By: Natalie Prescott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Sztrom
Represented By: Sean T. Prosser
Represented By: Natalie Prescott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: Michael Raymond Sew Hoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?