Napper v. San Diego County Sheriffs Dept. et al
| Ernest Napper, Jr. |
| Initials "LG", Vista Detention Facility, D. Rojas and San Diego County Sheriffs Dept. |
| 3:2021cv00100 |
| January 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Anthony J Battaglia |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Order: 1) Denying Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [Ecf No. #2 ] and Dismissing Complaint Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) 2) Denying Motion to Appoint Counsel [Ecf No. #3 ] As Moot. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 2/17/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jrm)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Ernest Napper, Jr. (jms)(jrd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ernest Napper, Jr. (jms)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against San Diego County Sheriffs Dept., Initials "LG", D. Rojas, Vista Detention Facility, filed by Ernest Napper, Jr. ($402.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-100-AJB-AGS. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
