Thapa v. Pekoske et al
| Gyan Bahadur Thapa |
| Janina S. Estudillo, Christopher J. LaRose, David Pekoske, Gregory Archambeault and Tae D. Johnson |
| 3:2021cv00117 |
| January 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Allison H Goddard |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Gregory Archambeault, Janina S. Estudillo, Tae D. Johnson, Christopher J. LaRose, David Pekoske (joint notice) (Bettwy, Samuel) (jms). |
Filing 3
ORDER Requiring Response to Petition and Setting Briefing Schedule. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 1/22/2021.(anh) (Docs 1 and 3 transmitted to AUSA) (anh).
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Gyan Bahadur Thapa of case(s) 20-cv-02327-DMS-KSC . (Medeiros, Christopher) CA notified (jms). |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Against David Pekoske, Tae D. Johnson, Gregory Archambeault, Janina S. Estudillo, Christopher J. LaRose, filed by Gyan Bahadur Thapa. (Filing fee $5.00, receipt number - ACASDC-15256489) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit List, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D)The new case number is 3:21-cv-117-CAB-AHG. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Medeiros, Christopher)(jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
