Bazinet v. Cook Incorporated et al
Brian Bazinet |
Cook Medical LLC, Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated and Cook Group Incorporated |
3:2021cv00189 |
February 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Bernard G Skomal |
Thomas J Whelan |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pl |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Transfer Letter Received from Southern District of Indiana. Case number in other court is 1:21-cv-06351 (jpp) |
Filing 3 Case transferred to District of Southern District of Indiana. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Southern District of Indiana*.*46 E. Ohio St.**Indianapolis, IN 46204* (Attachments: #1 MDL 2570 CTO-126) (jdt) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (sjt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Cook Group Incorporated, Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15303852). Filed by Brian Bazinet. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-189-W-BGS. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Richardson, Katelyn)(sjt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.