Rodriguez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., John Richard Shrewsberry, John C. Dineen and Sheppard Mullin Richter and Hampton, LLP |
Ismael Rodriguez |
3:2021cv00236 |
February 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Linda Lopez |
Dana M Sabraw |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 REPLY and Objection to Response to Motion re 1 MOTION to Compel filed by Ismael Rodriguez. (mme) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Joinder by John Richard Shrewsberry re #3 Response in Opposition to Motion,, (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Vogel, Edward) (mme). |
Filing 3 RESPONSE in Opposition re 1 MOTION to Compel (Petition to Confirm LAMP Arbitration Award) filed by John C. Dineen, Sheppard Mullin Richter and Hampton, LLP, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of John Dineen, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Exhibit A to RJN, #4 Exhibit B to RJN, #5 Exhibit C to RJN, #6 Exhibit D to RJN, #7 Exhibit E to RJN, #8 Exhibit F to RJN, #9 Exhibit G to RJN, #10 Exhibit H to RJN, #11 Exhibit I to RJN, #12 Exhibit J to Declaration, #13 Exhibit K to Declaration, #14 Proof of Service)(Vogel, Edward) (mme). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ismael Rodriguez. (smd) (sjt). |
Filing 1 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Ismael Rodriguez. (no document attached) (smd) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.