Alejandro Alve v. Gavin Newson et al
Alejandro Alve |
Gavin Newson and Ralph Diaz |
3:2021cv00349 |
February 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
Daniel E Butcher |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER Denying as Moot Motion for Reconsideration [Doc. No. #13 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 4/12/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service: Orders 9, 10, 14 )(anh) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Reconsideration re #7 Order Dismissing Case, by Alejandro Alve. (jms) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Vincent Paul LaPietra on behalf of Ralph Diaz (LaPietra, Vincent)Attorney Vincent Paul LaPietra added to party Ralph Diaz(pty:res) (anh). |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Address by Alejandro Alve (jms) |
Filing 10 ORDER Reopening Case and Setting Briefing Schedule. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher on 3/24/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service/CA Attorney General served petition and Order)(anh) |
Filing 9 ORDER Granting Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Doc. No. #8 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 3/23/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alejandro Alve. (jms) |
Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice and with leave to amend. If Petitioner wishes to proceed with this case, he must submit, no later than May 24, 2021, a copy of this Order with the $5.00 fee or with adequate proof of his inability to pay the fee. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 3/17/2021. (Blank Southern District of California In Forma Pauperis Application mailed to Petitioner)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) |
Filing 6 Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher assigned to transfer case from Central District of California. (no document attached) (jms)(jrd) |
Filing 5 Case transferred in from the Central District of California; Case Number 2:21-cv-01679-CAS-AFM. Original file received electronically. |
Filing 4 ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (es) [Transferred from California Central on 2/26/2021.] |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Christina A. Snyder and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111) (lh) [Transferred from California Central on 2/26/2021.] |
Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Alejandro Alve. (lh) [Transferred from California Central on 2/26/2021.] |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Christina A. Snyder and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon.(Filing Fee $5 DUE), filed by Petitioner Alejandro Alve. (lh) [Transferred from California Central on 2/26/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.