Booth v. Curiel et al
Plaintiff: Tammy Mae Booth
Defendant: Mark D. Feinberg, Jean M. Heinz, Gonzalo P. Curiel and Heinz & Feinberg Attorneys at Law
Case Number: 3:2021cv00469
Filed: March 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Bashant
Referring Judge: Ruben B Brooks
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0551
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mark D. Feinberg, Jean M. Heinz, Heinz & Feinberg Attorneys at Law re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Amended (Heinz, Jean) (jmo).
April 7, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Mark D. Feinberg, Jean M. Heinz, Heinz & Feinberg Attorneys at Law. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Proof of Service)(Heinz, Jean)Attorney Jean M Heinz added to party Mark D. Feinberg(pty:dft), Attorney Jean M Heinz added to party Jean M. Heinz(pty:dft), Attorney Jean M Heinz added to party Heinz & Feinberg Attorneys at Law(pty:dft) (jmo).
March 17, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons has been provided to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (fth) (dlg).
March 17, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gonzalo P. Curiel, Mark D. Feinberg, Jean M. Heinz, Heinz & Feinberg Attorneys at Law ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number CAS128357.), filed by Tammy Mae Booth. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, Additional attachment(s) added on 3/18/2021: #2 Copyright Form) (Copyright Form Mailed) The new case number is 3:21-cv-469-BAS-RBB. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case. (Booth, Tammy Mae)(fth) (dlg).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Booth v. Curiel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark D. Feinberg
Represented By: Jean M Heinz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jean M. Heinz
Represented By: Jean M Heinz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gonzalo P. Curiel
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heinz & Feinberg Attorneys at Law
Represented By: Jean M Heinz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy Mae Booth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?