Hornbeck v. United States of America et al
Plaintiff: Terry Hornbeck
Defendant: United States of America and USA
Case Number: 3:2021cv00491
Filed: March 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cathy Ann Bencivengo
Referring Judge: Andrew G Schopler
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2021 Filing 5 Letter by Terry Hornbeck. Nunc Pro Tunc 4/1/2021.(jms)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo Accepting Document: Letter, from Plaintiff Terry Hornbeck. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ.L.Rule 83.9 Parties to an action must refrain from writing ex parte letters to the judge. Nunc Pro Tunc 4/1/2021. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 4/1/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
March 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo Accepting re #1 Complaint, from Plaintiff Terry Hornbeck. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) exceed the page limitations set by S.D. Cal. CivLR 8.2(a) and S.D. Cal. General Order 653A, and are not accompanied by a properly supported Motion to Exceed page limitations or Motion for Emergency Relief from General Order 653A.; Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) received by U.S. Mail and not properly e-filed in accordance with S.D. Cal. General Order 653A.;. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 3/22/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
March 18, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terry Hornbeck. (jms)(jrd)
March 18, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Against United States of America, USA, filed by Terry Hornbeck. ($402.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-491-CAB-AGS. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)(jrd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hornbeck v. United States of America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terry Hornbeck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?