Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Buckley et al
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
DOES 1 through 10, Tasksuperior LLC and Lorraine W Buckley |
3:2021cv00511 |
March 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
M James Lorenz |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 ia |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Bevan, Eric) (jpp). |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Lorraine W Buckley.(mme) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Tasksuperior LLC served. (Bevan, Eric) (jpp). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (smd) (jms). |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent Wells Fargo & Company for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (smd) (jms). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lorraine W Buckley, Does 1 through 10, Tasksuperior LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15546308.), filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)The new case number is 3:21-cv-511-L-BLM. Judge M. James Lorenz and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case. (Bevan, Eric)(smd) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.