Robinson v. Bank of America, N.A.
Stanley Robinson |
Bank of America, N.A. |
3:2021cv00541 |
March 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Jill L Burkhardt |
William V Gallo |
Marilyn L Huff |
M James Lorenz |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1693 ef |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) by Bank of America, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), #2 Declaration of Robert Chestnut in Support of Bank of America, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), #3 Table of Exhibits to the Declaration of Robert Chestnut, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2, #6 Exhibit 3, #7 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6))(Callaway, David) (jpp). |
![]() |
Filing 15 RESPONSE re #14 Notice of Related Case filed by Bank of America, N.A.. (Callaway, David) (ag). |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Stanley Robinson of case(s) 3:21-cv-00484-L-WVG . (Swigart, Joshua) Proposed Low Number Order prepared (ag). |
![]() |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Barry William Lee on behalf of Bank of America, N.A. (Lee, Barry)Attorney Barry William Lee added to party Bank of America, N.A.(pty:dft)(ag). |
Filing 11 MINUTE ENTRY: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint (ECF No. #9 ) is GRANTED. Defendant Bank of America, N.A. shall file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff Stanley Robinson's Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) on or before May 20, 2021. (no document attached) (ag) |
Filing 10 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-15609633.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Funk, Allison) |
Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by Bank of America, N.A.. (Callaway, David) (ag). |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bank of America, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent BAC North America Holding Company for Bank of America, N.A... (Callaway, David) (ag). |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by David Rossiter Callaway on behalf of Bank of America, N.A. (Callaway, David)Attorney David Rossiter Callaway added to party Bank of America, N.A.(pty:dft) (ag). |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stanley Robinson. Bank of America, N.A. served. (Swigart, Joshua) (ag). |
![]() |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel G. Shay on behalf of Stanley Robinson (Shay, Daniel)Attorney Daniel G. Shay added to party Stanley Robinson(pty:pla) (jmr). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Juliana G. Blaha on behalf of Stanley Robinson (Blaha, Juliana)Attorney Juliana G. Blaha added to party Stanley Robinson(pty:pla) (jmr). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mme)(jrd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Bank of America, N.A. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15561698.), filed by Stanley Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-541-H-JLB. Judge Marilyn L. Huff and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (Swigart, Joshua)(mme) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.