Poland v. Walmart Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Julie Poland
Defendant: Does 1 to 100 and Walmart Inc.
Case Number: 3:2021cv00546
Filed: March 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jill L Burkhardt
Referring Judge: William Q Hayes
2 Judge: Dana M Sabraw
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Richard Lyman on behalf of Walmart Inc. (Lyman, Daniel)Attorney Daniel Richard Lyman added to party Walmart Inc.(pty:dft) (mme).
April 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF TRANSFER PURSUANT TO LOW NUMBER RULE. Case reassigned to Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw for all further proceedings. Judge William Q. Hayes no longer assigned to case. Create association to 3:21-cv-00534-DMS-JLB. The new case number is 21cv0546-DMS-JLB. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 4/12/2021. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 4/12/2021.(ag)
April 1, 2021 Filing 5 MINUTE ENTRY. Motion Title and Motion Number: Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Notice of Removal (ECF No. 3) RECORD of ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Extend Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint (ECF No. 3) is GRANTED. Defendant Walmart Inc. shall file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff Julie Polands Complaint (ECF No. 1-2 at 6-24) on or before April 26, 2021. Law Clerk: KL (no document attached) (jmr)
March 31, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Walmart Inc. of case(s) 21-cv-00535, 21-cv-00536, 21-cv-00539, 21-cv-00540, 21-cv-00543, 21-cv-00544, 21-cv-00545, 21-cv-00534, 21-cv-00549, 21-cv-00550, 21-cv-00551 . (King, Cory)
March 31, 2021 Filing 3 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, by Walmart Inc.. (King, Cory) (jmr).
March 29, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Walmart Inc.. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (King, Cory) (ag).
March 26, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15561736.), filed by Walmart Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Cory King)The new case number is 3:21-cv-546-WQH-JLB. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case.(zda) (jms).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Poland v. Walmart Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart Inc.
Represented By: Cory James King
Represented By: Daniel Richard Lyman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julie Poland
Represented By: Ian Pancer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?