Walker v. Montgomery et al
| Thomas Gaffney Walker |
| Xavier Becerra and Warren Montgomery |
| 3:2021cv00563 |
| March 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Transfer Letter Received from Central District of California. Case number in other court is 21-cv-00626 (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) |
| Filing 3 Case transferred to District of Central District of California, Southern Division. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Central District of California, Southern Division*.*411 WEST FOURTH STREET, ROOM 1-053**SANTA ANA, CA 92701-4516*. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 4/2/21. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service. cc: California Attorney General)(jmo) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Thomas Gaffney Walker. (jms) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Against Warren Montgomery, Xavier Becerra, filed by Thomas Gaffney Walker. ($5.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-563-BAS-MDD. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening] (jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
