Consumer Products Association, Inc. v. Bowmar Nutrition, LLC
| Consumer Products Association, Inc. |
| Bowmar Nutrition, LLC |
| 3:2021cv00596 |
| April 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 oc |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Bowmar Nutrition, LLC(an Iowa limited liability company). (Cole, William) (jrm). |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 by Bowmar Nutrition, LLC(an Iowa limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of William P. Cole, #3 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of William P. Cole)(Cole, William) (jrm). |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Consumer Products Association, Inc.. (Weller, Charles) (jrm). |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Bowmar Nutrition, LLC(an Iowa limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities)(Cole, William)Attorney William Paul Cole added to party Bowmar Nutrition, LLC(pty:dft) (jrm). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Consumer Products Association, Inc.. All Defendants served. (Weller, Charles) (jdt). |
| Filing 4 Amended Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jmo) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Consumer Products Association, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Info Sheet, #2 Exhibit) (Weller, Charles) (jmo). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (fth) (dlg). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Bowmar Nutrition, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15588768.), filed by Consumer Products Association, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-596-W-MDD. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Weller, Charles)(fth) (dlg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Consumer Products Association, Inc. v. Bowmar Nutrition, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bowmar Nutrition, LLC | |
| Represented By: | William Paul Cole |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Consumer Products Association, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Charles C. Weller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
