Salgado v. Quick et al
Janey Salgado |
Jon Quick, Does 1 through 50 and Richard Montes |
3:2021cv00600 |
April 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Michael M Anello |
Nita L Stormes |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 cv |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference. A videoconference Early Neutral Evaluation is set for 7/14/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 6/4/2021. (tcf) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Richard Montes.(Crenshaw, Lyndsay)Attorney Lyndsay Crenshaw added to party Richard Montes(pty:dft) (tcf). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Janey Salgado. Richard Montes served. (Dicks, James) (tcf). |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Janey Salgado. Jon Quick served. (Dicks, James) (tcf). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (zda)(jms). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15592827.), filed by Janey Salgado. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-600-MMA-NLS. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case. (Dicks, James)(zda) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.