ASPEN Medical Products, LLC v. Breg, Inc.
Plaintiff: ASPEN Medical Products, LLC
Defendant: Breg, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2021cv00631
Filed: April 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Mitchell D Dembin
Referring Judge: William Q Hayes
2 Judge: Janis L Sammartino
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 pt
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER Granting #18 Joint Motion for the Extension of Time in which to Respond to the Complaint. Defendant SHALL RESPOND to the Complaint on or before 6/11/2021. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/6/2021. (tcf)
May 5, 2021 Filing 18 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by Breg, Inc. (Acker, Eric) (tcf).
May 5, 2021 Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Jane Vandervalk on behalf of Breg, Inc. (Vandervalk, Sarah)Attorney Sarah Jane Vandervalk added to party Breg, Inc.(pty:dft) (tcf).
May 5, 2021 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Janet S Kim on behalf of Breg, Inc. (Kim, Janet)Attorney Janet S Kim added to party Breg, Inc.(pty:dft) (tcf).
May 5, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by John R. Lanham on behalf of Breg, Inc. (Lanham, John)Attorney John R. Lanham added to party Breg, Inc.(pty:dft) (tcf).
May 5, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Martin Acker on behalf of Breg, Inc. (Acker, Eric)Attorney Eric Martin Acker added to party Breg, Inc.(pty:dft) (tcf).
April 28, 2021 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ASPEN Medical Products, LLC. Breg, Inc. served. (De Bretteville, Jason) (tcf).
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Jason S. Shull, re #9 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/23/2021.(rmc)
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of John R. Hutchins, re #8 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/23/2021.(rmc)
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Joseph J. Berghammer, re #7 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/23/2021.(rmc)
April 23, 2021 Filing 9 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-15653974.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Shull, Jason) (rmc).
April 23, 2021 Filing 8 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-15653926.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Hutchins, John) (rmc).
April 23, 2021 Filing 7 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-15653880.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Berghammer, Joseph) (rmc).
April 19, 2021 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ASPEN Medical Products, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Aspen Acquisition, LLC for ASPEN Medical Products, LLC. (De Bretteville, Jason) (tcf).
April 19, 2021 Filing 5 MINUTE ENTRY: The Honorable William Q. Hayes declines assignment pursuant to General Order 598 and requests that the case be assigned to a participating patent judge. Judge Janis L. Sammartino added to the case. Judge William Q. Hayes is no longer assigned to case and Judge Janis L. Sammartino is now assigned to the case. The new case number is 2cv0631-JLS-MDD.(no document attached) (ag)
April 15, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Robert Stephens on behalf of ASPEN Medical Products, LLC (Stephens, Matthew)Attorney Matthew Robert Stephens added to party ASPEN Medical Products, LLC(pty:pla) (ag).
April 13, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (smd) (jms).
April 13, 2021 Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *9,393,149*, *8,956,315*, *8,142,377*, *7,674,234*, *7,141,031* cc:USPTO (smd) (jms).
April 12, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Breg, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15611929.), filed by ASPEN Medical Products, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Table of Exhibits, #3 A, #4 B, #5 C, #6 D, #7 E, #8 F, #9 G, #10 H, #11 I, #12 J, #13 K, #14 L, #15 M, #16 N, #17 O, #18 P)The new case number is 3:21-cv-631-WQH-MDD. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (De Bretteville, Jason)(smd) (jms).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ASPEN Medical Products, LLC v. Breg, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Breg, Inc.
Represented By: Sarah Jane Vandervalk
Represented By: Janet S Kim
Represented By: John R. Lanham
Represented By: Eric Martin Acker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ASPEN Medical Products, LLC
Represented By: Jason De Bretteville
Represented By: Jason S. Shull
Represented By: John R. Hutchins
Represented By: Joseph J. Berghammer
Represented By: Matthew Robert Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?