Valentin v. Saul
Plaintiff: Paul Anthony Valentin
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 3:2021cv00643
Filed: April 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
Presiding Judge: Mitchell D Dembin
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 id
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Marla K Letellier on behalf of Andrew Saul (Letellier, Marla)Attorney Marla K Letellier added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft) (jpp).
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, Pursuant to General Order 707, by Paul Anthony Valentin. (jpp)
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER finding as moot #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File: Plaintiff moved for an extension of time to file a consent form. #7 . Plaintiff attached the signed consent form to the motion. Accordingly, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to file the consent form, located at docket number 7-1 as a separate docket entry. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 05/06/2021. (no document attached) (jb1)
May 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Consent to Magistrate form by Paul Anthony Valentin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit #A Consent form)(Pena, Jonathan) (jpp).
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Paul Anthony Valentin. Andrew Saul served. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Pena, Jonathan) (mme).
April 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jpp)
April 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 4/14/2021. (jpp)
April 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE ASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to General Order 707, United States Magistrate Mitchell D. Dembin has been randomly assigned. Plaintiff should print and complete the attached consent/declination form. The executed form must be received by the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of this notice. (fth) (dlg).
April 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Paul Anthony Valentin. (fth) (dlg).
April 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, IFP Filed, filed by Paul Anthony Valentin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-643-MDD. Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin is assigned to the case. (Pena, Jonathan)(fth) (dlg).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Valentin v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Represented By: Marla K Letellier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul Anthony Valentin
Represented By: Jonathan Omar Pena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?