Weiss v. Perspecta Inc. et al
| Annie Weiss |
| Perspecta Inc., Sanju K. Bansal, Sondra L. Barbour, Ramzi M. Musallam, Michael E. Ventling, Betty J. Sapp, Glenn A. Eisenberg, Pamela O. Kimmet, John M. Curtis, Philip O. Nolan and Lisa S. Disbrow |
| 3:2021cv00649 |
| April 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| William Q Hayes |
| Linda Lopez |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Annie Weiss of case(s) A-21-830758-B re #1 Complaint, . (Elkins, Joel) Modified on 4/15/2021 no proposed low number order prepared, no related case in this district (ag). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (smd) (jms). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Sanju K. Bansal, Sondra L. Barbour, John M. Curtis, Lisa S. Disbrow, Glenn A. Eisenberg, Pamela O. Kimmet, Ramzi M. Musallam, Philip O. Nolan, Perspecta Inc., Betty J. Sapp, Michael E. Ventling ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15618902.), filed by Annie Weiss. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-649-WQH-LL. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez are assigned to the case. (Elkins, Joel)(smd) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
