Crook v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
| Cynthia Crook |
| John Does 1-25, Midland Funding LLC and Midland Credit Management, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00772 |
| April 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Daniel E Butcher |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Discharging Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 4/28/2021.(anh)
|
| Filing 4 RESPONSE re #3 Order to Show Cause filed by Cynthia Crook. (Stieglitz, Jonathan) (anh). |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why the Case Should Not Be Transferred to the Eastern District of California. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 4/21/2021.(anh)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ekb) (jms). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against John Does 1-25, Midland Credit Management, Inc., Midland Funding LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15637709.), filed by Cynthia Crook. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)The new case number is 3:21-cv-772-CAB-DEB. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case. (Stieglitz, Jonathan A)(ekb) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
