McFalls v. Alonzo
| Robert Nelson McFalls |
| Mario Alonzo |
| 3:2021cv00849 |
| April 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael M Anello |
| Ruben B Brooks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b). The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR). Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 6/23/2021.(A copy of this Order was mailed to Kathleen Allison, Secretary, CDCR) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Michael M. Anello Accepting re #1 Complaint from Plaintiff Robert Nelson McFalls. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) exceed the page limitations set by S.D. Cal. CivLR 8.2(a) and S.D. Cal. General Order 653A, and are not accompanied by a properly supported Motion to Exceed page limitations or Motion for Emergency Relief from General Order 653A. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. Signed by the Chambers of Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/14/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
|
|
Filing 2
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Robert Nelson McFalls. (jms)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Nelson McFalls. (jms)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Against Mario Alonzo, filed by Robert Nelson McFalls. ($402.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 CDCR Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-849-MMA-RBB. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)(jrd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McFalls v. Alonzo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Nelson McFalls | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mario Alonzo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
