Klosterman v. bioMerieux, Inc. et al
| Edward Klosterman |
| bioMerieux, Inc., Does 1 through 25 and Charles "Dan" Biondo |
| 3:2021cv00908 |
| May 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Anthony J Battaglia |
| Ruben B Brooks |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 ed |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER Regulating Discovery and Other Pre-Trial Proceedings. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 9/1/2022. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/8/2022 02:00 PM before Judge Anthony J. Battaglia. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 6/17/2021.(jrm)
|
|
Filing 7
Order Following Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Setting Rule 26 Compliance. Joint Discovery Plan due 7/22/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 6/17/2021.(jrm) Modified docket text; NEF regenerated on 6/17/2021 (jrm).
|
| Filing 6 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks: Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference held on 6/17/2021. (Plaintiff Attorney James M. Hester). (Defendant Attorney Tracie Childs). An in-person Settlement Conference is set for 12/8/2021 9:00 AM in Magistrate Judge Brooks's chambers, 221 West Broadway, Suite 5195, San Diego, California. All parties, claims adjusters for insured defendants, and representatives with complete authority to enter into a binding settlement, as well as the principal attorneys responsible for the litigation, must be present and legally and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case at the settlement conference. If circumstances relating to the COVID-19 public emergency require the conference to be conducted virtually, the Court will notify the parties that it will proceed by Zoom videoconference. Failure to attend or obtain proper excuse will be considered grounds for sanctions. Updated settlement conference briefs shall be submitted to efile_brooks@casd.uscourts.gov on or before 12/1/2021. (no document attached) (cdc) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE AND ORDER Setting Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation and Case Management Conference set for 6/17/2021 08:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 5/18/2021.(jrm)
|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Charles "Dan" Biondo, bioMerieux, Inc. re #3 Notice of Party With Financial Interest, #2 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal), #1 Notice of Removal,, (Childs, Tracie) (jrm). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by bioMerieux, Inc., Charles "Dan" Biondo,. No Parties With Financial Interest. (fth) (dlg). |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by bioMerieux, Inc., Charles "Dan" Biondo, (fth) (dlg). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15720503.), filed by bioMerieux, Inc., Charles "Dan" Biondo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Tracie Childs in Support of Removal, #3 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #5 Exhibit C to Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit D to Notice of Removal, #7 Exhibit E to Notice of Removal)The new case number is 3:21-cv-908-AJB-RBB. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case. (fth) (dlg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
