Surkhi v. King et al
| Omar Surkhi |
| Chantelle King and Does 1 to 10 |
| 3:2021cv00916 |
| May 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Nita L Stormes |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 rl |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: (1) Remanding Action for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; and (2) Terminating Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #4 ). The Court remands this action to the San Diego Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 5/17/21. (certified copy sent to superior court)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jmo)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Chantelle King. (fth) (dlg). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Chantelle King. No Parties With Financial Interest. (fth) (dlg). |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Chantelle King. (fth) (dlg). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL, IFP Filed, filed by Chantelle King. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)The new case number is 3:21-cv-916-BAS-NLS. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case.(fth) (dlg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
