Neville v. Dill
Plaintiff: MD Robert Neville and Robert Neville, MD
Defendant: Marguerite Dill
Case Number: 3:2021cv01148
Filed: June 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cathy Ann Bencivengo
Referring Judge: Karen S Crawford
2 Judge: Gonzalo P Curiel
3 Judge: Mitchell D Dembin
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 nr
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 12, 2021 Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that For the reasons set forth above, Defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED.Judgment is entered accordingly.(anh)
August 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Granting Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. No. #5 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 8/12/2021. (anh)
August 11, 2021 Filing 6 RESPONSE in Support re #5 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Marguerite Dill. (Richards, Sara) (anh).
July 14, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Marguerite Dill. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Request for Judicial Notice)(Coughlin, Catherine) (anh).
June 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF TRANSFER PURSUANT TO LOW NUMBER RULE. Case reassigned to Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin for all further proceedings. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel, Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford no longer assigned to case. Create association to 3:19-cv-00321-CAB-MDD. The new case number is 21cv1148-CAB-MDD.. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 6/25/21. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 6/24/21.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
June 22, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Marguerite Dill of case(s) 19-cv-0321-CAB-MDD. (ekb)(jms).
June 22, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Judge Assignment. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford assigned to the case. The new case number is 21-cv-1148-GPC-KSC. (no document attached) (ekb)
June 22, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15852858.), filed by Marguerite Dill. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Complaint)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1148-CAB-MDD. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case.(ekb) (jms).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neville v. Dill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marguerite Dill
Represented By: Catherine Lacy Coughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MD Robert Neville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Neville, MD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?