Edwards v. Pollard et al
Plaintiff: Allen Edwards
Defendant: Marcus Pollard, D. Lewis, Garcia and B.D. Phillips
Case Number: 3:2021cv01157
Filed: June 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: William V Gallo
Referring Judge: Dana M Sabraw
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Fee for Civil Case Opening: Paid on 8/2/2021. (jms) (jms).
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order Denying Motions to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and to Add Defendants #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Denying #5 Motion. Plaintiff may re-open this case by paying the full $402 filing fee on or before September 20, 2021. If he chooses this course, Plaintiff must ensure his check is submitted and made payable to the Clerk of the Court, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California, and include reference to Civil Case No. 3:21-cv-01157-DMS-WVG. If Plaintiff does not pay the full $402 filing fee in one lump sum on or before September 20, 2021, the case will remain dismissed without prejudice based on his failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. 1914(a) and without any further Order of the Court. Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 7/29/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(zda)
July 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Declaration and Exhibits in Support of Complaint (ECF #1 ) by Allen Edwards.Nunc Pro Tunc 7/19/2021 (jms)
July 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw Accepting Document: Declaration and Exhibits in Support of Complaint [ECF No. #1 ], from Plaintiff Allen Edwards. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation, Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document, Civ.L. Rule 5.1.e Exhibits must be attached to the documents to which they belong and must be readable without detaching the exhibit from the accompanying document. Nunc Pro Tunc 7/19/2021. Signed by the Chambers of Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 7/21/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
July 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to Add Defendants by Allen Edwards. Nunc Pro Tunc 7/12/2021 (jms)
July 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw Accepting Document: Motion to Add Defendants, from Plaintiff Allen Edwards. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation, Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document, Civ.L. Rule 15.1.a Every pleading to which amendment is permitted as a matter of right must be complete in itself without reference to the superseded pleading. Nunc Pro Tunc 7/12/2021. Signed by the Chambers of Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 7/19/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
June 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement from Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility - Trust Office. (jms)
June 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Allen Edwards. (jms)(jrd)
June 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Against Marcus Pollard, B.D. Phillips, D. Lewis, Garcia, filed by Allen Edwards. ($402.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 CDCR Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1157-DMS-WVG. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)(jrd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edwards v. Pollard et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marcus Pollard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B.D. Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allen Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?