Hernandez v. Gore et al
| Saul Hernandez |
| William Gore and Rob Bonta |
| 3:2021cv01180 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Nita L Stormes |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. The Petition is dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend. If Petitioner wishes to proceed with a habeas action pursuant to section 2254, he must, no later than August 31, 2021, file a First Amended Petition. If Petitioner instead seeks to proceed with a habeas action pursuant to section 2241, he must file a new habeas action pursuantto 28 U.S.C. 2241 which will be given a new civil case number. (Blank Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 and a blank Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 mailed to Petitioner). Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 7/01/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
|
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Against William Gore, Rob Bonta, filed by Saul Hernandez. (Filing fee $5.00 - receipt number CAS130650) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1180-CAB-NLS. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case.(jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
