Whittington v. Deines et al
John Joseph Whittington, Jr., John Joseph Whittington Jr and John-Joseph Whittigton Jr |
Lisa Deines, Jennifer Rose, Priscilla Villafana, Caitlin Martin Jones Zaback, Browder Alphonso Willis III, Layanie L. Johnson and Gary Michael Bubis |
3:2021cv01224 |
July 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Jill L Burkhardt |
Dana M Sabraw |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 cv |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss or in the Alternative, Quash for Improper Service Pursuant to FRCP 12(B)(5) by Layanie L. Johnson, Priscilla Villafana. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Erica Cortez, #3 Proof of Service)(Cortez, Erica)Attorney Erica R. Cortez added to party Layanie L. Johnson(pty:dft), Attorney Erica R. Cortez added to party Priscilla Villafana(pty:dft) (ag). |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint And/Or To Seek More Definite Statement [F.R.C.P. Rules 8, 12(B)(1), 12(B)(4), 12(B)(5), 12(B)(6), And 12(E)] by Caitlin Martin Jones Zaback. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Proof of Service)(Shull, Nima) (zda). |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Nima Shull on behalf of Caitlin Martin Jones Zaback (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Shull, Nima)Attorney Nima Shull added to party Caitlin Martin Jones Zaback(pty:dft) (zda). |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint with Prejudice by Gary Michael Bubis, Browder Alphonso Willis III. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities In Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint with Prejudice by Judicial Defendants Judge Gary M. Bubis and Judge Browder A. Willis III, #2 Proof of Service)(Duke, Carmela)Attorney Carmela E. Duke added to party Gary Michael Bubis(pty:dft), Attorney Carmela E. Duke added to party Browder Alphonso Willis III(pty:dft) (zda). |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Joseph Whittington Jr. Layanie L. Johnson served. (zda) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Joseph Whittington Jr. Browder Alphonso Willis III served. (zda) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Joseph Whittington Jr. Priscilla Villafana served. (zda) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Joseph Whittington Jr. Gary Michael Bubis served. (zda) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Joseph Whittington Jr. Caitlin Martin Jones Zaback served. (zda) |
Filing 5 Certificate of Service by John Joseph Whittington. (zda) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued RE: Amended Complaint. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons has been provided to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (Mailed to plaintiff John Joseph Whittington Jr) (zda) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (ekb). (jms). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Lisa Deines, Jennifer Rose ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number CAS130878.), filed by John Joseph Whittington, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1224-DMS-JLB. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (Whittington Jr., John-Joseph)(ekb) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.