Sparkman v. Monsanto Company et al
| Gisela Sparkman |
| Monsanto Company and Does 1-50 |
| 3:2021cv01336 |
| July 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Todd W Robinson |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pl |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Transfer Letter Received from California Northern District. Case number in other court is 3:21-cv-06497 (jpp) |
| Filing 3 Case transferred to District of Northern District of California. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Northern District of California*.*450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16th Floor**San Francisco, CA 94102-3434* (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order MDL 2741 - CTO-283) (jmo) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (fth) (rmc). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Monsanto Company; Does 1-50 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15965443.), filed by Gisela Sparkman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1336-TWR-BLM. Judge Todd W. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case. (Gomez, John) (fth) (rmc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
