S.S. et al v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: S.S., Eunjin Stern and William Stern
Defendant: Peloton Interactive, Inc. and Does 1 through 50
Case Number: 3:2021cv01367
Filed: July 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Roger T Benitez
Referring Judge: Ruben B Brooks
2 Judge: Daniel E Butcher
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 pl
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Certificate of Filing Notice to Plaintiffs of Removal of Civil Action to USDC SD CA by Peloton Interactive, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Bosman, Erin)
July 29, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Peloton Interactive, Inc. No Parties With Financial Interest. (fth)
July 29, 2021 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Peloton Interactive, Inc. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (fth)
July 29, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Benjamin S. Kagel by Peloton Interactive, Inc. (fth)
July 29, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance Julie Y. Park by Peloton Interactive, Inc. (fth)
July 29, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Erin M. Bosman by Peloton Interactive, Inc. (fth)
July 29, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15979293.), filed by Peloton Interactive, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Complaint, #3 Exhibit Summons, #4 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit Application and Order of Guardian ad Litem)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1367-BEN-RBB. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case. (fth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: S.S. et al v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: S.S.
Represented By: Rick J. Nehora
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eunjin Stern
Represented By: Rick J. Nehora
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Stern
Represented By: Rick J. Nehora
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peloton Interactive, Inc.
Represented By: Benjamin Scott Kagel
Represented By: Erin McCalmon Bosman
Represented By: Julie Y. Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?